Welcome! Log in or Sign Up!

My Airport Operations

sponsored by

Airport Operations,airports,software,Maintenance

Gbarentine's Blog

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

  • February 11, 2011
  • Views (238)
  • Comments (4)
  • Print

Those of us in the Southwest region received this notice, I was not sure if other regions sent it out or if this makes it down to everyone. I would like to hear what other airports are hearing about this and what anyone has heard that the FAA is wanting to include in the Part 139.

FAA

Southwest Region, Airports Division

Safety Standards Branch


Airport Certification Information Bulletin 2011-004



Notice of Proposed Rulemaking:

The FAA proposes to amend the airport certification standard in Part 139. The

airport issues being addressed:

1. Require periodic training for all personnel authorized to access the non-

movement area;

2. Require a certificate holder to periodically evaluate the surface characteris-

tics of runways;

3. Require a certificate holder that allows operations below 1,200 feet RVR to

implement a SMGCS plan in its airport certification manual;

4. Clarify the applicability of Part 139 based on the number of aircraft passen-

ger seats used for passenger-carrying operations;

5. Prohibit fraudulent or intentionally false statements in a certificate or other

record.






Send your comments on or before April 4, 2011.


Please pass this along to everyone you know, give your comments and opinions. Let us not allow more regulation without reason. I do not know what the intentions are but I know we could do without more requirements.

 

Thank you,

Glen

Post Comments

Add Your Comment!

Log in to leave a comment or Create an account
The AAAE Ops and Safety committee and their Training committee are working to extend the comment period. Reading the reasons for the non movement area training rule that air carrier employees have accidents throws a lot of costs on the airport certificate holder I see no reason not to have it. Throw it in with SIDA badge renewal and security training. But to have to train each driver with non movement access would add about 10,000 hours of interactive training time plus manpower hours to process each person's record. Also I think this adds to the burden of implementing SMS. There are just too many mandated changes coming from DC these days. Changes to last changes even.
Here is the link to the NPRM. http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2011/pdf/2011-2164.pdf

All personnel who access the non-movement area, at least from my reading of the NPRM, does not mean just drivers or just airport employees.

If the Airport is required to provide all of the annual training now for everyone who enters the non-movement area and include subjects that used to only be covered under initial OJT (FOD prevention, Jet blast and prop hazards etc...) this is going to be an extra large load my office can not handle.

If the tenants are going to do the training and the Airport is required to monitor to ensure they comply with the FAA reg I do not believe we will ever pass an inspection again.

If the FAA really wants this training done annually another solution needs to be out there.

This appears to be the same issue I had with the SMS since that includes all users as well.

the first one is going to be a major problem for us and 1,000,000,000,000 drivers! 2 and 3 are already done here.
» All comments
» Comments RSS